![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
. | ![]() |
. |
![]() by Brooks Hays Washington DC (UPI) Nov 05, 2020
Proposed amendments to a 1994 law preventing the logging of trees with diameters greater than 21 inches could undermine the protection of the region's largest trees. New research, published Thursday in the journal Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, suggest the widest trees dominate carbon storage in the forests of Oregon and Washington State. When scientists surveyed the population of wide-diameter trees in study plots on national forest lands in the Pacific Northwest, they found trees with diameters in excess of 21 inches accounted for just 3 percent of the tree population, but stored 42 percent of the total above-ground carbon. The findings are only the latest to highlight the ecological services provided by bigger, older trees. Previous studies have shown forests with healthy populations of larger, older trees tend to be more heterogenous and host greater biodiversity. They also store more carbon than homogenous forest plots dominated by younger, smaller trees. Forests with bigger, older trees are also more resilient to wildfire. "Large trees represent a small proportion of trees in the forest, but they play an exceptionally important role in the entire forest community -- the many unique functions they provide would take hundreds of years to replace," lead study author David Mildrexler, systems ecologist with Eastern Oregon Legacy Lands, said in a news release. After surveying the trunk diameters and distribution of tree species in forest plots, researchers used well-established equations for estimating biomass. Roughly half of a tree's biomass is made up of carbon. Researchers found that trees with trunks measuring more than 30 inches in diameter accounted for just 0.6 percent of the tree population, but these wide-load trees stored 16 percent of the carbon in the forest plots. The data showed that the older and bigger trees get, the more carbon they store with each year of growth. In other words, over time, bigger trees become more and more efficient at storing carbon. "If you think of adding a ring of new growth to the circumference of a large tree and its branches every year, that ring adds up to a lot more carbon than the ring of a small tree." Mildrexler said. "This is why specifically letting large trees grow larger is so important for climate change because it maintains the carbon stores in the trees and accumulates more carbon out of the atmosphere at a very low cost," he said. According to Mildrexler, the findings suggest policy makers need to strengthen, not undermine, protections for the forest's biggest trees. "Large trees are the cornerstones of diversity and resilience for the entire forest community," Mildrexler said. "They support rich communities of plants, birds, mammals, insects, and micro-organisms, as well as act as giant water towers that tap into groundwater resources and cool our planet through evaporation."
![]() ![]() China's most important trees are hiding in plain sight Boston MA (SPX) Nov 02, 2020 In ecosystems around the globe, the danger of being a common or widespread species is the tendency to be overlooked by conservation efforts that prioritize rarity. In forests, the most common species can be essential to ecosystem structure and function, which crumble with the decline of these pivotal trees, known collectively as foundation species. In an effort to identify forest foundation species and elevate their conservation status before they disappear, a unique research collaboration b ... read more
![]() |
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us. |