![]() |
|
Battle heats up over EU carbon market reform Brussels, Belgium, June 10 (AFP) Jun 10, 2026 With a major reform of Europe's carbon market just a month away, EU states, industry and environmental groups are locked in battle over the bloc's flagship climate tool. The European Commission has been under intense pressure to overhaul the two-decade-old Emissions Trading System (ETS), as the 27-nation EU seeks to shore up industry while tackling high energy costs. The EU executive held talks on the sensitive file Wednesday, ahead of putting forward a finalised reform proposal on July 15. the stakes have heightened since the Iran war sent energy prices soaring. The commission is "really walking on eggshells," summed up Phuc-Vinh Nguyen, an energy specialist at the Jacques Delors Institute, citing "immense pressure" from industry and some member states.
The ETS forces heavy polluters to pay for the greenhouse gases they emit, obliging them to buy allowances that are capped in number, sold in auctions and tradeable. The price of a tonne of carbon dioxide varies, currently standing at around 75 euros ($85), while the total number of permits shrinks over time to encourage emission cuts. To support the transition, companies receive some free allowances, but these are gradually reduced and were initially due to disappear by 2034 -- a key point of contention in the current debate.
Caught between the United States and China, the EU has shifted to a more pro-business stance since the start of commission chief Ursula von der Leyen's second mandate in 2024 -- prompting a rollback of environmental rules that marked her first term. In that context, large segments of European industry -- notably Germany's chemical sector -- have turned on the carbon trading scheme, accusing it of pushing up electricity prices and symbolising EU bureaucracy. Among EU states, Italy under Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has been most vocal in calling for the system to be suspended pending far-reaching reform. Several of the EU's most carbon-intensive countries, from the Czech Republic to Poland, are critical of the scheme -- which is strongly defended by others from Scandinavia to Spain. Between the two camps, EU heavyweights Germany and France are beginning to call for "tailor-made adjustments", according to Nguyen.
This could mean free allowances being phased out more slowly and extended beyond 2034, provided companies commit to long term decarbonisation. The EU has to decide whether to extend the scheme to cover the waste sector and international flights departing from the bloc -- a move strongly opposed by airlines and on which commissioners appeared divided after Wednesday's talks. At member-state level, Brussels wants ETS revenues channelled into decarbonising industry -- an area where performance varies widely, from frontrunners like Portugal to countries lagging far behind. Finally, the EU executive is expected to set out how a proposed 30-billion-euro investment "accelerator" for industrial decarbonisation will operate. The commission has already floated ideas aimed at reassuring industry. One is a proposal for curbing price volatility while anther would give out extra free allowances for 2026-2030 -- with the potential to save industry up to four billion euros. The commission insists it has no plans to dismantle a system it touts as an inspiration for other countries. But environmental organisations warn of a broad watering-down of the scheme. One collateral victim could be "ETS 2" -- the planned extension of carbon pricing to road transport and building heating, which has already been pushed back from 2027 to 2028 at the request of countries including Poland and Hungary. |
|
|
|
All rights reserved. Copyright Agence France-Presse. Sections of the information displayed on this page (dispatches, photographs, logos) are protected by intellectual property rights owned by Agence France-Presse. As a consequence, you may not copy, reproduce, modify, transmit, publish, display or in any way commercially exploit any of the content of this section without the prior written consent of Agence France-Presse.
|