Subscribe free to our newsletters via your
. Earth Science News .

Subscribe free to our newsletters via your

Global Warming Is Real But Not A Priority

Global warming may be real in the minds of many Americans, but most people still see the problem as far away and not a current major risk, says Anthony Leiserowitz of the University of Oregon.
by Staff Writers
Eugene OR (SPX) Feb 23, 2007
Most Americans believe global warming is real but a moderate and distant risk. While they strongly support policies like investing in renewable energy, higher fuel economy standards and international treaties, they strongly oppose carbon taxes on energy sources that put carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.

These results were reported by Anthony Leiserowitz, a courtesy professor of environmental studies at the University of Oregon, in a talk during the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in San Francisco.

His conclusions, based on a national survey conducted in 2003 are detailed in a new book, "Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change - Facilitating Social Change."

The study by Leiserowitz, also a scientist at Decision Research, a non-profit research institute in Eugene, Ore., looked at the risk perceptions, policy views and behavior of Americans in regards to global warming.

Although the data demonstrating climate change have grown stronger in recent years, Americans rank global warming as a low priority compared to other national issues such as the Iraq war, the economy, health care and education, and environmental issues such as air and water pollution, Leiserowitz said.

Using affective-image analysis, Leiserowitz also asked Americans what thoughts or images came to mind when thinking about global warming. Sixty-one percent of their associations fell into just four categories: melting ice in the Arctic; warmer temperatures; impacts on non-human nature; and polar ozone holes.

"These responses help us understand the connotative meaning of global warming - and why Americans react the way they do," Leiserowitz said. "These associations are to geographically or psychologically distant impacts, generic warming trends, or a completely different environmental problem. Thus it's not too surprising that global warming remains a relatively low priority.

"One of the most important things that we found is what we didn't find," he added. "We found no references, no associations, of the impacts of climate change on either human health or extreme weather events. Yet these are, arguably, among the most important potential impacts, because, ultimately, the consequences are going hurt people."

The survey, detailed in Chapter 2 of the book, also identified two particular groups, or "interpretive communities," of Americans at the extremes of global warming beliefs:

* Alarmists, who have apocalyptic visions, envision "death of the planet" or post-nuclear-war-like scenarios. "These visions are well beyond the most extreme scientific scenarios," Leiserowitz said. Alarmists, he found, are slightly more likely to be liberal and to hold strong egalitarian values.

* Naysayers, who deny, discount or disbelieve the reality of climate change. "These people claim that there is no scientific evidence, blame global warming on media hype, or even hold dark conspiracy theories, such as scientists making up data to protect their job security," he said. "Naysayers are much more likely to be white, male, conservative, Republican, very religious, hold strongly individualistic or hierarchist values and to get their news and information from radio talk shows."

The majority of Americans are in between these two extremes, he added, but are more closely aligned with the alarmists than the naysayers.

In his talk, Leiserowitz also described several strategies for communicators as they tell the global warming story: Highlight local impacts; illustrate how climate change is impacting people and places already, such as in Alaska; describe the potential impacts on human health; talk honestly about remaining uncertainties; and tailor both the messages and the messengers so they resonate with the values held by particular audiences.

The book, he said, is the outgrowth of a conference held in 2004 by the National Center for Atmospheric Research, in which participants - including cognitive psychologists, experts in risk perception, sociologists, anthropologists, climate scientists and historians - discussed how scientists and others might communicate climate change more effectively.

Leiserowitz will become a research scientist and director of strategic initiatives in the Yale University School of Forestry and Environmental Studies as of March 1.

Email This Article

Related Links
University of Oregon
Learn about Climate Science at

Russia, Kyoto Protocol And Climate Change
Moscow (RIA Novosti) Feb 21, 2007
Two years have passed since the Kyoto Protocol (KP) went into force. A total of 150 nations have ratified this extraordinary international document. It embodies humankind's pragmatism, and is aimed at reducing the negative anthropogenic influence on the biosphere and the climate. Preparations for its implementation will be completed this year, and monitoring of compliance with KP commitments will start in 2008.

  • Bacteria Could Steady Buildings Against Earthquakes
  • Indonesia Delays Start Of Plan To Plug Mud Volcano
  • Indonesia To Use Concrete Balls To Plug "Mud Volcano"
  • Sending Out An SOS Russian Satellites Come To The Rescue

  • Global Warming Is Real But Not A Priority
  • Russia, Kyoto Protocol And Climate Change
  • In Chilly Washington Global Warming Gets New Airing
  • Scientists To Focus On Climate Change And Energy At AAAS Meeting

  • Scientists Gear Up For Envisat 2007 Symposium
  • ITT Passes Critical Design Review for GOES-R Advanced Baseline Imager
  • Sandstorm Over The Mediterranean
  • 3D Upstart Eyes Google Earth With Helicopter

  • Tiny High-Frequency Cryocooler Is Cold And Efficient
  • PacWind To Offer Three New Proprietary Applications For Wind Energy
  • Biofuel to power Indonesia's anti-poverty drive
  • Australia To Clip Greenhouse Gas Emmissions With Phase Out Of Inefficient Lighting

  • Moscow Region Authorities Dismiss Rumors Of Bird Flu Among Humans
  • Scientists On The Way To Sifting Out A Cure For HIV
  • British Company In Bird Flu Outbreak May Cut Jobs
  • End The Black AIDS Plague

  • Chimpanzees Found To Use Tools To Hunt Mammalian Prey
  • St Petersburg Court Rejects Schoolgirl Suit Over Darwinism
  • Rat Like Senses A Whisker Away From Humans
  • Antarctic Warming To Reduce Animals At Base Of Ecosystem As Penguin Shift South

  • Disposable Sensor Uses DNA To Detect Hazardous Uranium Ions
  • Ivory Coast Toxic Dump Victims Upset Over Pay Deal
  • Sand Latest Irritant In Singapore Regional Ties
  • EasyJet Chief Says Business Travellers Have Role In Saving Environment

  • Clovis People Maybe Not First To Populate North America
  • Birth Rate And Competition Were Major Reasons For Past Hominid Extinctions
  • Team Takes First Deep Dive Into Molecular Machinery Of Human Brain
  • Neuroscientists Explain Inner Workings Of Critical Pain Pathway

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement