|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| . |  |
. |
|
|
|
Philadelphia PA (SPX) Oct 15, 2007 2007 has been a big year for removal of protected animals from the endangered species list. Three species native to North America that were among the first to be listed after the passage of the Endangered Species Preservation Act of 1966 have been recovered and no longer need protection. In February, Canis lupus was delisted in certain areas of its range; in March, Ursus arctos horribilis was delisted; in July, Haliaeetus leucocephalus was delisted, making headlines. Latin names notwithstanding, these animals are familiar to most Americans for their contributions to our collective folklore, native mythology, tall-tales and national identity: they are the gray wolf, Yellowstone grizzly bear and the American bald eagle. This should be good news to conservationists. The legislation and science were successful, and 40 years later, three majestic animals figuring prominently in our natural history are back from the brink of extinction. But Saint Joseph's University professor of biology Scott McRobert, Ph.D., noted expert in the ecological, genetic and evolutionary aspects of animal behavior has misgivings. "I don't necessarily see them coming off the list as a positive thing, or as a testament to the success of these animals across their range," he said. Many conservationists are concerned that removing animals from the list will expose them to new dangers. For instance, DDT no longer threatens bald eagles since it has been banned from use, but what will happen if eagle habitats, which were once protected, are negatively impacted by over-development? Is it possible to get the raptors back on the list? Yes, but McRobert is not optimistic that the process would be easy -- or expedient. "Putting a species on the endangered list takes lots of time and hard work. It requires a great deal of study and petitioning. This is good in the sense that the list is meaningful; otherwise, people would simply place everything on the list, and it would have no real value," he noted. "On the negative side, species in dire need may have to wait years to get protection. Many animals have gone extinct waiting to receive the protection offered by being listed." "Once a species is on the list, I'm basically against removing it -- and thereby removing its protection," he added. Community Email This Article Comment On This Article Related Links Saint Joseph's University Darwin Today At TerraDaily.com
Life's Hot Spot
Moffett Field CA (SPX) Oct 11, 2007Thousands of new kinds of marine microbes have been discovered at two deep-sea hydrothermal vents off the Oregon coast by scientists at the MBL (Marine Biological Laboratory) and University of Washington's Joint Institute for the Study of Atmosphere and Ocean. Their findings, published in the October 5 issue of the journal Science, are the result of the most comprehensive, comparative study to date of deep-sea microbial communities that are responsible for cycling carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur to help keep Earth habitable. |
|
|
| The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement |
