Earth Science News  





. How Did Our Ancestors' Minds Really Work

Padana, a young female orangutan at the Leipzig Zoo, who was one of the research subjects. Image: Knut Finstermeier, MPI for Evolutionary Anthropology
by Staff Writers
Nijmegen, Holland (SPX) Sep 07, 2006
How did our evolutionary ancestors make sense of their world? What strategies did they use, for example, to find food? Fossils do not preserve thoughts, so we have so far been unable to glean any insights into the cognitive structure of our ancestors.

However, in a study recently published in Current Biology (September 5, 2006), researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics and their colleagues at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology were able to find answers to these questions using an alternative research method: comparative psychological research. In this way, they discovered that some of the strategies shaped by evolution are evidently masked very early on by the cognitive development process unique to humans.

Being able to remember and relocate particular places where there is food is an asset to any species. There are two basic strategies for remembering the location of something: either remembering the features of the item (it was a tree, a stone, etc.), or knowing the spatial placement (left, right, middle, etc.).

All animal species tested so far - from goldfish, pigeons and rats though to humans - seem to employ both strategies. However, if the type of recall task is designed so that the two strategies are in opposition, then some species (e.g. fish, rats and dogs) have a preference for locational strategies, while others (e.g. toads, chickens and children) favor those which use distinctive features.

Until now, no studies had systematically investigated these preferences along the phylogenetic tree. Recently, however, Daniel Haun and his colleagues have carried out the first research of its kind into the cognitive preferences of a whole biological family, the hominids.

They compared the five species of great apes - orangutans, gorillas, bonobos, chimpanzees and humans - to establish which cognitive strategies they prefer in order to uncover hidden characteristics. The researchers worked on the assumption that if all five species share particular preferences, these are very probably a part of the evolutionary legacy of our most recent common ancestors, who died out some 15 million years ago.

At the Wolfgang Koehler Primate Research Center at the Leipzig Zoo, the researchers hid coveted items using two different strategies (see Fig.2): In the place condition, the item remained in the same place it was hidden in previously, but under a different object (e.g. a stone); in the feature condition the object remained the same, but the place changed.

It was established that all four great ape species and one-year-old children actually use the location as a way of finding something hidden, even if it is hidden under a completely different object. This outcome suggests that this preference has been part of our cognitive structure for 15 million years.

The researchers then investigated three-year-old children and discovered a difference: Unlike younger children, they considered the object under which the item was hidden to be the most reliable indication of its whereabouts, even if the location had changed completely.

The scientists have sufficient evidence to conclude that 1-year-old children and great apes do not lack the capability to develop a feature-based strategy, but simply prefer to use a place-based strategy. Evidently, humans reassess these preferences as their cognitive development continues.

"The unique human cognitive development seems to mask some of our evolved strategies even before we reach the age of three," says Daniel Haun. "In future experiments, we therefore want to find out which areas of cognitive development in humans, for example language acquisition, are responsible for this restructuring of cognitive preferences."

The new methodical approach and the results it yields pave the way for the systematic study of the cognitive structures of our evolutionary ancestors and thus ultimately to an improved understanding of the origins of human thinking. [BH]

Related Links
Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
All About Human Beings and How We Got To Be Here

Ancient Rock Art In Australia Threatened By Major Gas Project
Sydney (AFP) Sep 05, 2006
Some of the world's oldest rock art looks set for destruction to make way for a multi-billion dollar gas project, the Australian government admitted Tuesday.

.
Get Our Free Newsletters Via Email
  



  • Trauma Expert Crusades For Changes In Disaster Preparedness And Recovery
  • China To Build Earthquake Warning System At Three Gorges Reservoir Area
  • Interview: Katrina Lessons Learned
  • Katrina Response A 'Systemic Failure': Former US Emergency Response Chief

  • Greenhouse Gas Bubbling From Melting Permafrost Feeds Climate Warming
  • New Evidence Shows Antarctica Has Warmed In Last 150 Years
  • Top British Scientist Says Adaptation Only Real Solution For Climate Change
  • Evolution of Old World Fruit Flies on Three Continents Mirrors Climate Change

  • What Is It Like To Be On A NASA Hurricane Mission
  • Renewed Volcanic Activity At The Phlegrean Fields Tracked By Envisat
  • China To Launch 1st Environment Monitoring Satellite
  • NG Demonstrates Synthetic Aperture Laser Radar for Tactical Imagery

  • Moscow Mayor Says Winter Energy Deficit Could Reach 20 Percent
  • Fresh Declines For Oil Prices As Iran Fears Recede
  • Schwarzenegger Ready To Sign Bill Limiting Greenhouse Gas Emissions
  • Protesters Aim To Shut Down British Power Station

  • Cancer Surge Overwhelming AIDS-Crisis Botswana
  • Africa Braces For New, Deadly, TB Strains
  • Viruses Can Jump Between Primates And Humans
  • Is The Cure In The Blood For Bird Flu

  • Analysis: Animal-Rights Groups Up The Ante
  • A Cognitive Strategy Shared By Human Infants And Our Great-Ape Kin
  • Embosymbiont Offers Clues To How Plants Came To Be
  • Aussie Croc Hunter Steve Irwin Killed In 'Freak' Stingray Attack

  • Analysis: No Room For Shangri-La In China
  • Over 2000 Feared To Have Lead Poisoning In China
  • Ivory Coast Government Resigns Over Pollution Scandal
  • Edible Coatings Will Be The Packaging Of The Future

  • How Did Our Ancestors' Minds Really Work
  • Ancient Rock Art In Australia Threatened By Major Gas Project
  • Well Educated More Interested In Designing Babies
  • Snakes Credited For Our Keen Vision

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2006 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA PortalReports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additionalcopyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement