Subscribe free to our newsletters via your
. Earth Science News .

Brain Does Not Work The Way A Computer Does Recognizing Speech
by Staff Writers
Boston MA (SPX) May 02, 2014

Patterns of activation induced by listening to human speech move across brain hemispheres over a period of 300 milliseconds in these images, produced by combining data from EEG, MEG and MRI studies. Watch the video here. Courtesy A. Conrad Nied and David W. Gow, PhD; Neuropsychology Laboratory and Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital. Supported by grants from the National Institute for Deafness and other Communication Disorders, the MIND Institute and the National Center for Research Resources.)

How does the brain decide whether or not something is correct? When it comes to the processing of spoken language - particularly whether or not certain sound combinations are allowed in a language - the common theory has been that the brain applies a set of rules to determine whether combinations are permissible.

Now the work of a Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) investigator and his team supports a different explanation - that the brain decides whether or not a combination is allowable based on words that are already known. The findings may lead to better understanding of how brain processes are disrupted in stroke patients with aphasia and also address theories about the overall operation of the brain.

"Our findings have implications for the idea that the brain acts as a computer, which would mean that it uses rules - the equivalent of software commands - to manipulate information. Instead it looks like at least some of the processes that cognitive psychologists and linguists have historically attributed to the application of rules may instead emerge from the association of speech sounds with words we already know," says David Gow, PhD, of the MGH Department of Neurology.

"Recognizing words is tricky - we have different accents and different, individual vocal tracts; so the way individuals pronounce particular words always sounds a little different," he explains. "The fact that listeners almost always get those words right is really bizarre, and figuring out why that happens is an engineering problem. To address that, we borrowed a lot of ideas from other fields and people to create powerful new tools to investigate, not which parts of the brain are activated when we interpret spoken sounds, but how those areas interact."

Human beings speak more than 6,000 distinct language, and each language allows some ways to combine speech sounds into sequences but prohibits others. Although individuals are not usually conscious of these restrictions, native speakers have a strong sense of whether or not a combination is acceptable.

"Most English speakers could accept "doke" as a reasonable English word, but not "lgef," Gow explains. "When we hear a word that does not sound reasonable, we often mishear or repeat it in a way that makes it sound more acceptable. For example, the English language does not permit words that begin with the sounds "sr-," but that combination is allowed in several languages including Russian. As a result, most English speakers pronounce the Sanskrit word 'sri' - as in the name of the island nation Sri Lanka - as 'shri,' a combination of sounds found in English words like shriek and shred."

Gow's method of investigating how the human brain perceives and distinguishes among elements of spoken language combines electroencephalography (EEG), which records electrical brain activity; magnetoencephalograohy (MEG), which the measures subtle magnetic fields produced by brain activity, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which reveals brain structure.

Data gathered with those technologies are then analyzed using Granger causality, a method developed to determine cause-and-effect relationships among economic events, along with a Kalman filter, a procedure used to navigate missiles and spacecraft by predicting where something will be in the future. The results are "movies" of brain activity showing not only where and when activity occurs but also how signals move across the brain on a millisecond-by-millisecond level, information no other research team has produced.

In a paper published earlier this year in the online journal PLOS One, Gow and his co-author Conrad Nied, now a PhD candidate at the University of Washington, described their investigation of how the neural processes involved in the interpretation of sound combinations differ depending on whether or not a combination would be permitted in the English language.

Their goal was determining which of three potential mechanisms are actually involved in the way humans "repair" nonpermissible sound combinations - the application of rules regarding sound combinations, the frequency with which particular combinations have been encountered, or whether sound combinations occur in known words.

The study enrolled 10 adult American English speakers who listened to a series of recordings of spoken nonsense syllables that began with sounds ranging between "s" to "shl" - a combination not found at the beginning of English words - and indicated by means of a button push whether they heard an initial "s" or "sh."

EEG and MEG readings were taken during the task, and the results were projected onto MR images taken separately. Analysis focused on 22 regions of interest where brain activation increased during the task, with particular attention to those regions' interactions with an area previously shown to play a role in identifying speech sounds.

While the results revealed complex patterns of interaction between the measured regions, the areas that had the greatest effect on regions that identify speech sounds were regions involved in the representation of words, not those responsible for rules.

"We found that it's the areas of the brain involved in representing the sound of words, not sounds in isolation or abstract rules, that send back the important information. And the interesting thing is that the words you know give you the rules to follow. You want to put sounds together in a way that's easy for you to hear and to figure out what the other person is saying," explains Gow, who is a clinical instructor in Neurology at Harvard Medical School and a professor of Psychology at Salem State University.

Gow and his team are planning to investigate the same mechanisms in stroke patients who have trouble producing words, with the goal of understanding how language processing breaks down and perhaps may be restored, as well as to look at whether learning words with previously nonpermissible combinations changes activation in the brains of healthy volunteers. The study reported in the PLOS One paper was supported by National Institute of Deafness and Communicative Disorders grant R01 DC003108.


Related Links
Massachusetts General Hospital
All About Human Beings and How We Got To Be Here

Comment on this article via your Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, Hotmail login.

Share this article via these popular social media networks DiggDigg RedditReddit GoogleGoogle

Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News

Prehistoric caribou hunting site discovered under Lake Huron
Ann Arbor, Mich. (UPI) Apr 28, 2013
Beneath more than 120 feet of Lake Huron water, archaeologists have found one of the most elaborate prehistoric stone structures ever discovered in the Great Lakes region. The main portion of the 9,000-year-old structure has been dubbed Drop 45 Drive Lane; it features a walled stone lane which leads into a cobblestone cul-de-sac-like structure. Nearby are hunting blinds, where Paleo-Ind ... read more

350 dead, hundreds missing in Afghan landslide village

No answers, only hope as MH370 China father heads home

Malaysia Airlines to end hotel stays for MH370 families

Italy cruise ship removal project halted: media

Element 117 confirmed by scientists, closer to being officially named

TV terrifies and compels with viruses and robots

Newly Identified 'Universal' Property of Metamagnets May Lead to Everyday Uses

Researchers Develop Harder Ceramic for Armor Windows

Sustainable barnacle-repelling paint

Study in 'Science' finds missing piece of biogeochemical puzzle in aquifers

NASA Begins Field Campaign to Measure Rain in Southern Appalachians

Relentless rains drench US East Coast

Network for tracking earthquakes exposes glacier activity

Krypton-dating technique allows researchers to accurately date ancient Antarctic ice

Cougars' diverse diet helped them survive the Pleistocene mass extinction

Ancient sea-levels give new clues on ice ages

Danone says will buy New Zealand dairy factories

Corn crops increasingly vulnerable to hot, dry weather

U.S. corn yields are increasingly vulnerable to hot, dry weather

Saving Crops and People with Bug Sensors

Deep origins to the behavior of Hawaiian volcanoes

Australian tsunami database reveals threat to continent

Magma in Mount St. Helens rising, but no risk of eruption

Odds of storm waters overflowing Manhattan seawall up 20-fold

EU CAR force operational, at Bangui airport: sources

Libya security forces lose 9 dead in Benghazi clashes

China's premier Li Keqiang set for first Africa trip

War, late rains spark Somalia 'crisis' warning

DNA 'Sat Nav' directs you to your ancestor's home

Neanderthals were not inferior to modern humans

Extreme sleep durations may affect brain health in later life

Brain Does Not Work The Way A Computer Does Recognizing Speech

The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2014 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement All images and articles appearing on Space Media Network have been edited or digitally altered in some way. Any requests to remove copyright material will be acted upon in a timely and appropriate manner. Any attempt to extort money from Space Media Network will be ignored and reported to Australian Law Enforcement Agencies as a potential case of financial fraud involving the use of a telephonic carriage device or postal service.