Free Newsletters - Space - Defense - Environment - Energy - Solar - Nuclear
..
. Earth Science News .




POLITICAL ECONOMY
Outside View: Defining the tax debate
by Jack Rafuse
Washington (UPI) Sep 27, 2013


disclaimer: image is for illustration purposes only

At nearly 74,000 pages, the U.S. Tax Code is a bloated, destructive and unwieldy mess.

It demands fear and inspires loathing more than respect. Accidentally violate it, and you encounter bureaucratic revenge and pay a debilitating fine; do so willfully, and you also serve prison time.

It answers unasked questions: "What happens to citizens when Congress exercises nearly unlimited authority to enact creative and continuous financing schemes to support its insatiable appetite for spending?" And, "Why are not Congress and congressional staff members treated the same way as every other citizen under the tax laws they enact?"

To individual Americans -- and to the large and small businesses that employ them -- the tax code is no joke. Even most politicians admit a major overhaul is past due -- and they have powerful incentives to act.

For the fourth consecutive year, no budget is in place and the fiscal year starts in days. With elections looming and its ability to borrow presently curtailed for having once again reached its "debt ceiling," Congress has powerful incentives but do the members have the political will?

And, just as importantly, do they have the intellectual restraint to carry out this debate productively and politically honest manner?

Reforming the U.S. Tax Code will be a long, hard process featuring heated and boisterous debate. Given the generational import at stake -- and the healthy deliberation our democracy demands -- this is perfectly appropriate; at its best, it would be reminiscent of the debate over adoption of the U.S. Constitution. We can only hope that both sides argue skillfully and truthfully about their positions.

The foundational principles upon which the tax reform movement is based must be simple to articulate and easy to defend.

The following goals -- missions -- should guarantee appeal: simplify the law; apply it fairly; broaden the tax base; stabilize the deficit and ensure that the United States remains (or regains its position) as a desirable place to create, encourage and maintain business.

Once, those were sacrosanct principles. Be independent, not tempted by political bias and motivation and never wield taxes as a punitive weapon in a war of ideologies.

Now, however, they must be reiterated, fought for and prayed for. Otherwise in the coming debates the oil and natural gas industry will continue as the target of choice for politicians of all stripes.

The energy sector is where lawmakers on both sides of the aisle delight in misdefining and taking creative liberty with the definition and applicability of certain tax terms.

"Subsidy," "deduction" and "credit" are the three most frequent victims of this practice, which is attributable either to simple ignorance or political convenience. To be certain, this dynamic is most evident in the long-running effort to increase taxes on U.S. oil and companies by referring to their deductions and cost recovery measures as "subsidies."

At the same time, tax-law subsidies go to "green" companies by the billions of dollars, and are labeled "investments." According to the law, a subsidy is a direct payment from the government to an entity to increase its economic viability (think of the wind, solar and electric car industries).

A deduction spelled out in the tax code, on the other hand, is intended to ensure that a U.S. firm is taxed only on its actual income earned in the United States and not double-taxed after paying taxes to other countries in which it does business.

One absurd example of definition-twisting in which some advocates identify and call out oil industry "subsidies," is The Environmental Law Institute's recent categorization of the Low Income Heating Energy Assistance Program as a subsidy to oil and natural gas companies.

This is absurd; LIHEAP has long been a sacred cow to lawmakers on both sides of the aisle -- because it subsidizes individuals seeking to heat their homes.

In an equally far reach, Oil Change International, meanwhile, singles out a large section of the Pentagon budget directed to defense of oil overseas as, again, a subsidy paid to U.S. oil companies.

These are gross mischaracterizations not just of these individual provisions, but of the general concept of a subsidy. It is flexible semantics at its worst and it is toxic to any earnest effort to enact worthwhile tax policy.

While a subsidy is characterized by a direct payment from the government to an entity designed to increase its economic viability -- as seen in the wind, solar and electric car industries -- a deduction is intended to ensure that a U.S. firm is taxed only on its actual income.

Tax Code provisions include deductions for both U.S. businesses and American individuals; deductions recognize and take account of legitimate expenses and are key to calculating tax liability, preventing double-payment with its anti-competitive implications and ensuring that a company can rely on a predictable investment environment as it seeks to compete both at home and abroad.

Assailing legitimate business accounting formulas -- like Section 199 manufacturing credits or protections for dual capacity taxpayers -- as "oil subsidies" is, as I have pointed out in the past, factually inaccurate. It's also deleterious to the U.S. energy industry, its job-creation power and our economy as a whole, given the manner in which such rhetoric undermines the vital mechanisms that make the arcane U.S. tax code navigable.

It is vital, as Congress engages in tax reform and seeks to fund the U.S. government beyond the looming fiscal deadlines, that policymakers resist the strained rhetoric that has for so long plagued the debate over corporate taxation in the United States.

If Congress wants an honest and informed debate about the future of energy tax policy, it must accurately portray the tax treatments in question. And, rather than penalize, it should be thinking of ways to help U.S. companies be more effective, economical, and competitive. Only that approach will add high-paying jobs and new resources to boost the nation's economy.

(Jack Rafuse served as the former White House energy adviser and is the principal of the Rafuse Organization. He has also worked for Unocal, an international oil and natural gas company, for 25 years.)

(United Press International's "Outside View" commentaries are written by outside contributors who specialize in a variety of important issues. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of United Press International. In the interests of creating an open forum, original submissions are invited.)

.


Related Links
The Economy






Comment on this article via your Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, Hotmail login.

Share this article via these popular social media networks
del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg RedditReddit GoogleGoogle




Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News





POLITICAL ECONOMY
US Fed probing market trades before policy release
Washington (AFP) Sept 25, 2013
The US Federal Reserve said Wednesday that it is looking into allegations that traders received information about its policy decision last week ahead of the official release time. The Fed said it would be reviewing how it disseminates often market-moving monetary policy decisions after an analyst said that movements on the gold exchange just before the release last Wednesday could suggest so ... read more


POLITICAL ECONOMY
Storm-stricken Acapulco hit by new floods

Twitter launches emergency alerts

NASA tests space radar for finding buried victims

Japan suspends senior official over tsunami victims blog

POLITICAL ECONOMY
Green photon beams more agile than optical tweezers

Space oddity: the mystery of 2013 QW1

Domain walls as new information storage medium

Invention jet prints nanostructures with self-assembling material

POLITICAL ECONOMY
Extinction and overfishing threats can be predicted decades before population declines

Spinning CDs to Clean Sewage Water

Current pledges put over 600 million people at risk of higher water scarcity

Algorithm finds missing phytoplankton in Southern Ocean

POLITICAL ECONOMY
Warming ocean thawing Antarctic glacier

Underlying ocean melts ice shelf, speeds up glacier movement

Arctic ice melt slows down: NASA

Polar bears change to diet with higher contaminant loads

POLITICAL ECONOMY
Modifying Rice Crops to Resist Herbicide Prompts Weedy Neighbors' Growth Spurt

Yellow peril: Are banana farms contaminating Costa Rica's crocs?

Climate change to shift Kenya's breadbaskets

Weather, yield compared for horticultural crops in Wisconsin and southern Ontario

POLITICAL ECONOMY
Pakistan quake survivors face long wait for aid

Pakistan quake island unlikely to last: experts

Mexico storms: 139 dead, 53 still missing

Geologists simulate deep earthquakes in the laboratory

POLITICAL ECONOMY
Mali rebels suspend talks with government: statement

Akgeria: Bouteflika seeks to outflank rival generals

160 UN peacekeepers desert Mali posts: military

Three Ivorian police killed in attacks

POLITICAL ECONOMY
Genetic study pushes back timeline for first significant human population expansion

Your brain digitally remastered for clarity of thought

Findings in Middle East suggest early human routes into Europe

Paleorivers across Sahara may have supported ancient human migration routes




The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2014 - Space Media Network. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement