by Brooks Hays
Los Angeles (UPI) Oct 22, 2015
A scientist at the U.S. Geological Survey is questioning the soundness of an alarming study authored by a NASA scientist.
The study -- published last month in the American Geophysical Union's Earth and Space Science journal -- claims there's a 99.9 percent chance a massive earthquake hits Los Angeles within the next three years.
But Robert Graves, a USGS seismologist who assisted with some of the statistical analysis involved in the research, isn't buying the paper's conclusions.
"I have serious doubts that the conclusions of the paper are supported by the analysis that's presented there," Graves, a coordinator for earthquake hazards in Southern California, told the Los Angeles Times earlier this week.
"The 99.9 percent number -- I don't know the method that was used to derive that. But basically, that's saying that's going to happen," Graves continued. "And that level of certainty, to my knowledge, is just not attainable. We can never be that certain."
The central focus of the recent paper was not to predict the Southern California's next major earthquake, but show how new satellite data can be used to map the energy stored in the complex systems of faults in San Gabriel Valley and Chino Hills.
By studying ground deformation seen in satellite imagery before and after the 2010 5.1-magnitude La Habra earthquake, researchers calculated how much energy was released and how much energy was bottled up along newly deformed fault lines. They also attempted to determine what these changes revealed about energy stored along buried and hidden fault lines.
"The earthquake faults in this region are part of a system of faults," said lead study author Andrea Donnellan, a principal research scientist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory. "They can move together in an earthquake and produce measurable surface deformation, even during moderate magnitude earthquakes. This fault system accommodates the ongoing shortening of Earth's crust in the northern Los Angeles region."
But Donnellan and her colleagues also looked at historical earthquake data as a way to contextualize their analysis and offer a benchmark for gauging its accuracy. In looking at the 32 earthquakes of magnitude 5 or greater that have shaken the Los Angeles region over the last 81 years, Donnellan's research team calculated a 99.9 percent chance of another happening within the next three years -- all but a sure thing.
Now, other geologists and earthquake experts are questioning that analysis.
Donnellan says the probability number is an aside, and that the real conclusion is that La Habra failed to unleash a majority of deep-lying seismic strain -- the earthquake's release was, instead, dominated by shaking along shallower fault lines.
"We never said in this paper we were predicting an earthquake. And we said that's the probability of an event," Donnellan said. "There is still a 0.1 percent chance it won't happen. So we need to test it. And that's what we are doing as scientists."
But discussion of the 99.9 percent prediction have dominated headlines. Graves says it's unclear how Donnellan and her colleagues arrive at their number.
"While the earthquake forecast presented in this paper has been published in the online journal Earth and Space Sciences, it has not yet been examined by the long-established committees that evaluate earthquake forecasts and predictions made by scientists," the USGS wrote in a Facebook update.
USGS scientists are constantly monitoring the potential for earthquakes. Their analysis differs from Donnellan's.
"The accepted random chance of a M5 or greater in this area in 3 years is 85 percent, independent of the analysis in this paper," they wrote.
The legitimacy of Donnellan's prediction is something to be worked out by scientists. The real world, however, will either prove both predictions right or wrong. Southern Californians hope they're wrong.
Bringing Order To A World Of Disasters
When the Earth Quakes
A world of storm and tempest
|The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2017 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. Privacy Statement|