![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
. | ![]() |
. |
![]() by Brooks Hays Washington DC (UPI) Dec 01, 2020
Planting trees and protecting forests are two of the myriad strategies for keeping carbon out of the atmosphere. Of all the options, they're considered the most eco-friendly, or greenest, but new research suggests planting and protecting trees does come with costs -- and those costs are quite a bit larger than has been previously estimated. According to a new study, published Tuesday in the journal Nature Communications, planting trees and conserving forests could reduce carbon dioxide emissions by as much 6 gigatons a year between 2025 and 2055. Researchers calculated the reductions would come with an annual price tag of $393 billion. "There is a significant amount of carbon that can be sequestered through forests, but these costs aren't zero," study co-author Brent Sohngen, professor of environmental economics at the Ohio State University, said in a news release. According to Sohngen and his colleagues, previous studies looking at the role of forest conservation in the global effort to curb climate change have largely ignored the effects on forest land use, management and trade. The new analysis showed protecting existing forests is a more cost effective way to curb carbon emissions than planting new trees. In places where forest harvesting is an essential economic activity, the study's authors suggest changes to how and when trees are harvested -- as opposed to total protection -- could offer a more cost-effective strategy for carbon reductions. Sohngen and company determined forest protection measures are likely to deliver the most bang for their buck in Brazil, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Indonesia. Unlike previous studies that have attempted to audit the economic impacts of various carbon sequestration, the latest calculus accounted for what researchers call "carbon leakage." When trees are planted on agricultural lands in one part of the world, researchers suggest market demands can trigger deforestation in other parts of the world. The study's authors are in agreement with the broader scientific community that carbon emissions must be significantly reduced to avoid catastrophic climate impacts. However, they suggest more work must be done to identify the most cost-effective strategies for curbing emissions. "Until now, there has been limited research investigating the costs of climate change mitigation from forests," said lead study author Kemen Austin. "Better understanding the costs of mitigation from global forests will help us to prioritize resources and inform the design of more efficient mitigation policies," said Austin, a senior policy analyst with RTI International, a nonprofit research institute based in North Carolina. Planting and protecting trees alone, however, won't be enough to prevent catastrophic climate change, researchers said. Efforts to conserve forests must be accompanied by robust efforts to scale green energy, like solar and wind power. "What we see is that you should devote about a third of your effort to this stuff and two-thirds to the other stuff -- to reducing coal, to investing in solar, to switching to electric," Sohngen said. "If you want your total mitigation to be as cheap as possible, that's what you would do."
![]() ![]() Deforestation in Brazilian Amazon surges to 12-year high Sao Paulo (AFP) Nov 30, 2020 Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon surged again over the past year, hitting a 12-year high, according to official figures released Monday that drew a chorus of condemnation of President Jair Bolsonaro's government. A total of 11,088 square kilometers (4,281 square miles) of forest was destroyed in Brazil's share of the world's biggest rainforest in the 12 months to August, according to the Brazilian space agency's PRODES monitoring program, which analyzes satellite images to track deforestation. ... read more
![]() |
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us. |