![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
. | ![]() |
. |
![]() by Brooks Hays Washington (UPI) Nov 14, 2018
Dams and reservoirs are supposed to solve the problem of water shortages, but new research suggests their unintended effects can worsen water crises in the long run. In a new paper published in the journal Nature Sustainability, scientists describe two phenomena, or effects, can undermine the benefits of dam and reservoir construction and expansion: the supply-demand cycle and the reservoir effect. The first phenomena is a principle of environmental economics, whereby supply begets demand. As the water supply is increased, demand rises, putting new pressures on a finite resource. Often, water shortages motivate the expansion of reservoirs, allowing for an even larger water supply and further increased demand. The supply-demand cycle ensures water crises get worse and worse over time, as pressure on the region's natural water supply yields increasing levels of environmental degradation. According to the new research, the vicious cycle can "quickly offset the initial benefits of reservoirs." The reservoir effect describes an over-reliance on a reservoir. Because an increased water supply offered by a reservoir can mask the effects of drought and water shortages, communities and governments over-reliant on reservoirs are less likely to adopt more sustainable water usage policies. "Over-reliance on reservoirs increases vulnerability, and therefore increases the potential damage caused by droughts," researchers wrote in their paper. According to the researchers, the reservoir effect works similarly to Gilbert White's levee effect. "The paradox is that levees, which reduce the frequency of flooding, can increase social vulnerability to floods in two ways: by creating a sense of complacency, which can act to reduce preparedness, and by creating incentives for more human settlements in areas prone to flooding," Giuliano Di Baldassarre, researcher at the University of Uppsala, wrote in commentary accompanying the paper. Di Baldassarre thinks the reservoir effect is even worse. Both the supply-demand cycle and reservoir effect describe the same basic problem. Dams and reservoirs tend to encourage increased water usage, when the problem calls for the opposite solution. Scientists hope their paper will inspire new studies into the impacts of reservoirs and dams around the world. "In the paper we show a number of cases of the proposed supply-demand cycle and reservoir effect happening around the world, from the Maja's to Las Vegas and from Athens in Greece to Melbourne, Australia," Sally Rangecroft, from the University of Birmingham, said in a news release. "These examples reveal that a social perspective of dealing with water shortage is crucial and research on feedbacks between water and society is paramount." In addition to more research into the interplay between hydrology, society and water infrastructure, Di Baldassarre and his colleagues call for policies that reduce water consumption. "We suggest less reliance on large water infrastructure, such as dams and reservoirs, and more efforts in water conservation measures," Di Baldassarre wrote.
![]() ![]() Dam problems, win-win solutions Orono ME (SPX) Nov 06, 2018 Decisions about whether to build, remove or modify dams involve complex trade-offs that are often accompanied by social and political conflict. A group of researchers from the natural and social sciences, engineering, arts and humanities has joined forces to show how, where and when it may be possible to achieve a more efficient balance among these trade-offs. Their work is featured in a paper published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). b>What's the dam problem? br> / ... read more
![]() |
|
The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2024 - Space Media Network. All websites are published in Australia and are solely subject to Australian law and governed by Fair Use principals for news reporting and research purposes. AFP, UPI and IANS news wire stories are copyright Agence France-Presse, United Press International and Indo-Asia News Service. ESA news reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. All articles labeled "by Staff Writers" include reports supplied to Space Media Network by industry news wires, PR agencies, corporate press officers and the like. Such articles are individually curated and edited by Space Media Network staff on the basis of the report's information value to our industry and professional readership. Advertising does not imply endorsement, agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by Space Media Network on any Web page published or hosted by Space Media Network. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) Statement Our advertisers use various cookies and the like to deliver the best ad banner available at one time. All network advertising suppliers have GDPR policies (Legitimate Interest) that conform with EU regulations for data collection. By using our websites you consent to cookie based advertising. If you do not agree with this then you must stop using the websites from May 25, 2018. Privacy Statement. Additional information can be found here at About Us. |