Hong Kong's appeal court granted the government's request for an injunction last week against "Glory to Hong Kong", an anthem that emerged during the city's 2019 pro-democracy protests.
The case has been closely watched for how it would affect tech firms and internet platform operators -- a concern that has been raised internationally over the free flow of information in Hong Kong.
The court order banned a range of acts that included performing and broadcasting the song with criminal intent, and listed 32 YouTube videos that the government deemed problematic.
YouTube, part of the Alphabet digital empire that includes Google, confirmed on Wednesday that it would block access to those 32 videos from Hong Kong users with immediate effect.
"We are disappointed by the Court's decision but are complying with its removal order," YouTube said in a statement.
"We'll continue to consider our options for an appeal, to promote access to information," it said, expressing concern the ruling would have a chilling effect on free expression online around the world.
All 32 YouTube videos listed in the court order were inaccessible from Hong Kong on Wednesday, AFP found, with some pages saying "this content is not available on this country domain due to a court order".
The Hong Kong government said in a statement Wednesday that it had noted the moves taken by some social media platforms to comply with the court order.
"The injunction pursues the legitimate aim of safeguarding national security and is necessary, reasonable, legitimate, proportionate and consistent" with the city's bill of rights, a government spokesperson said.
Hong Kong officials sought a court order last year after the song was mistakenly played at international sporting events as Hong Kong's official anthem, instead of China's "March of the Volunteers".
Officials at the time demanded internet giants such as Google remove the anthem from their search results and video platforms, but without success.
The United States has slammed the ban as a blow to Hong Kong's international reputation, while Beijing authorities defended the ban as a "necessary measure" to safeguard national security.
Lokman Tsui, a digital rights researcher and formerly Google's head of free expression for Asia and the Pacific, said it was "very disappointing that Google has decided to comply with a blatant request for political censorship".
Cornelius Hanung of the human rights group FORUM-ASIA said the court order was an "extraordinary measure", taking Hong Kong closer to countries "like Myanmar and Laos in terms of freedom of expression, where authoritarian governments impose a blanket approach to cripple rights".
su-hol/pbt
Related Links
Democracy in the 21st century at TerraDaily.com
| Subscribe Free To Our Daily Newsletters |
| Subscribe Free To Our Daily Newsletters |
