. Earth Science News .
US Public's View Of Energy Sources, Preferences and Environmental Issues Assessed

Close to two-thirds of respondents oppose the idea of locating a carbon capture and sequestration facility (an underground site that contains carbon dioxide gas extracted from coal) within 25 miles of their residences, and 75% oppose construction of either a coal-burning power plant or nuclear power plant nearby.
by Staff Writers
Menlo Park CA (SPX) Jul 31, 2007
While only two percent of the public indicates that energy is the most important problem facing the U.S. today, the results of a new MIT study based on data from Knowledge Networks offer a compelling snapshot of the public's declining satisfaction with oil for energy, as well as an openness toward alternative energy sources. Study findings highlight viewpoints on coal, dams, natural gas, nuclear power, oil, solar and wind.

From February 23 to March 4, 2007, a random sample of 1,200 online respondents took the same survey that Knowledge Networks administered for MIT in 2002 using a similar sampling methodology. Both studies were conducted on KnowledgePanel(SM) -- the only available probability selected, nationally representative Internet panel.

The general opinion of the U.S. public is:

+ 63% favor somewhat/much stronger environmental regulations
+ 36% indicate global warming is the most important U.S. environmental problem
+ 43% say that some action should be taken on global warming

When asked how harmful they think each power source is, the following percentage of the public indicates that the source is "very harmful:"

+ Coal              29%
+ Dams               3%
+ Natural Gas        5%
+ Nuclear           37%
+ Oil               24%
+ Solar              2%
+ Wind               2%

In the most recent MIT survey, 74% of respondents say they want to decrease use of oil, whereas clear majorities would choose to increase use of solar and wind "a lot" -- a finding in line with 2002. However, when respondents are given purchase price information on solar and wind, their responses reveal diminished support for these energy sources.

Respondents also had reservations about some energy by-products. Close to two-thirds of respondents oppose the idea of locating a carbon capture and sequestration facility (an underground site that contains carbon dioxide gas extracted from coal) within 25 miles of their residences, and 75% oppose construction of either a coal-burning power plant or nuclear power plant nearby.

Perceived environmental harm has the largest effect on support for a given fuel type, especially for coal and nuclear power. However, despite growing public concern over climate change, one finding has not changed since 2002: only a remote connection exists in the public's mind between electricity generation and global warming.

The survey is part of the MIT Energy Initiative. A more extensive working paper is available at the MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research and the MIT Public Opinion Research Training Lab.

Community
Email This Article
Comment On This Article

Related Links
Knowledge Networks
Powering The World in the 21st Century at Energy-Daily.com



Memory Foam Mattress Review
Newsletters :: SpaceDaily :: SpaceWar :: TerraDaily :: Energy Daily
XML Feeds :: Space News :: Earth News :: War News :: Solar Energy News


China To Step Up Energy Efficiency Drive
Beijing (AFP) Jul 28, 2007
China has announced plans to double spending on improving energy efficiency and slashing pollution, in an effort to combat its dismal environmental record. The government will spend an extra 10 billion yuan (1.33 billion US dollars) on reducing energy use and cutting pollution, according to a statement from the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), the state body responsible for economic planning.







  • Philippine Volcano Erupts As Nation Prays For Drought Breaking Rain
  • More Rains Forecast As England And Wales See Wettest Months Since 1766
  • Floods Leave England Awash As Fires Burn Across Continental Europe
  • More Flooding As England Battles Power Cuts And Water Shortages

  • UN Chief Urges New Climate Change Deal By 2009
  • Climate Change Sucks Water From China's Two Longest Rivers
  • Drip, Drip Of Global Warming Spells Change In Northern Russia
  • Climate Change, Energy Security Top APEC Agenda

  • ESA Mission Highlighted At Remote Sensing Conference
  • Third Sino-Brazilian EO Satellite To Be Launched By October
  • Ball Aerospace Prepares To Ship WorldView I
  • DigitalGlobe Expands Commercial Imagery Distribution Network In Australia And New Zealand

  • US Public's View Of Energy Sources, Preferences and Environmental Issues Assessed
  • A Bipartisan Call For Clean Energy In Congressional Package
  • China To Step Up Energy Efficiency Drive
  • Africa Starts To Gear Up For Biofuels

  • Treat HIV Babies Early
  • Revealing The Global Threat Of Bird Flu
  • Reviving The HIV Vaccine Hunt
  • China To Make Cuban Dengue Mosquito Killer

  • Scientists Excited By Indonesian-Caught Coelacanth
  • Discovery Provides Key Evidence Of Life's Beginnings
  • The Society Of Vertebrate Paleontology Speaks Out On The Creation Museum
  • Ice Age Survivors In Iceland

  • New Aerogels Could Clean Contaminated Water And Purify Hydrogen For Fuel Cells
  • China To Make It Harder For Heavy Polluters To Borrow Money
  • Quebec's Famous Lakes Teeming With Blue-Green Algae
  • Study Finds Contaminated Water Reaching Florida's Offshore Keys

  • New Clue Into How Diet And Exercise Enhance Longevity
  • New Research Proves Single Origin Of Humans In Africa
  • Energy Efficiency Reason For Evolution Of Upright Walking
  • Evidence Found For Novel Brain Cell Communication

  • The content herein, unless otherwise known to be public domain, are Copyright 1995-2007 - SpaceDaily.AFP and UPI Wire Stories are copyright Agence France-Presse and United Press International. ESA Portal Reports are copyright European Space Agency. All NASA sourced material is public domain. Additional copyrights may apply in whole or part to other bona fide parties. Advertising does not imply endorsement,agreement or approval of any opinions, statements or information provided by SpaceDaily on any Web page published or hosted by SpaceDaily. Privacy Statement